CASE LAW - Defence of Necessity
- Read more about CASE LAW - Defence of Necessity
- 1 comment
- Log in to post comments
Tejveer Parmar successfully used the defence of necessity to defend himself against a charge of speeding. He was initially convicted in traffic court but appealed the conviction. The justice agreed, allowed the appeal, quashed the ticket conviction and acquitted him of speeding.

On the 14th of November, 2015 at about 9:00 am, Ken Chung was operating an Audi northbound on Oak Street approaching West 41st Avenue in Vancouver. Evidence suggested that his speed was about 140 km/h in the 50 km/h zone.
Q: I was issued two tickets in June of 2018, one of them for excessive speed. I was and still am an N driver. It occurred at 142 Street and 72nd Avenue in Surrey in a speed trap. I acknowledge the fact that I was speeding but did not reach the over 40km/h threshold. I have evidence from my iPhone 8 Plus and the Life 360 app that shows the speed I reached was 3km/h fewer than 40km/h over the limit. Any advice is greatly appreciated.
Question: In the winter, how do police determine what is a safe speed? I was driving Highway 5 in a storm and didn't really want to do 45 km/h with a 2 km line of traffic in the left lane. I passed the train of cars, but only did about 70 km/h. I felt that it was safe for myself in the truck that I was driving.