When you are driving behind or approaching a cyclist, pedestrian or other vulnerable road user, giving them enough space is about more than courtesy. British Columbia law establishes minimum distances that drivers must maintain when passing vulnerable road users.
There are two different things to understand: the distance you should maintain when following a vulnerable road user and the minimum distance required when passing one.
Vulnerable Road Users
For these rules, vulnerable road users include pedestrians, people operating or riding on cycles, and other prescribed persons. The prescribed persons include people using certain mobility devices, people riding animals and people using certain animal- or cycle-drawn devices.
Following a Vulnerable Road User
When following a vulnerable road user, you should leave a distance that is reasonable and prudent, having regard for the amount and nature of traffic and the condition of the highway.
When these changes to the Motor Vehicle Act were introduced in 2023, they included a proposed requirement to leave at least 3 metres when following a vulnerable road user, except while overtaking and passing. This requirement was created as section 162.1 of the Act.
Section 162.1 was enacted, but it has not been brought into force. It therefore is not part of the current law and does not impose a 3-metre minimum following distance today. You can see it listed among the provisions of the Motor Vehicle Act that have not been brought into force.
No explanation for why section 162.1 has not been brought into force has been published by the Province. There is no special 3-metre following-distance requirement in force. Drivers must still operate their vehicles safely and, when following another vehicle, maintain a reasonable and prudent distance appropriate to the circumstances.
Passing a Vulnerable Road User
Before passing, you must first determine that the pass can be made safely. You must then maintain the required minimum distance while passing.
The minimum passing distance depends on the posted speed limit and where the vulnerable road user is travelling:
- 1 metre when the posted speed limit is 50 km/h or less.
- 1.5 metres when the posted speed limit is more than 50 km/h.
- 0.5 metre when passing someone who is on a sidewalk or in a protected cycle lane.
The distance is measured from the furthest protruding part of your vehicle to the furthest protruding part of the vulnerable road user or their equipment. See section 157.1 of the Motor Vehicle Act for the complete wording of the passing requirement.

What If You Cannot Leave Enough Space?
Don't pass.
If there is not enough room to maintain the required distance safely, slow down and wait until there is.
A cyclist may need to move around a pothole, drain, parked vehicle or other hazard. A pedestrian may need to step around an obstruction. The legal minimum distance is not necessarily enough for every situation, so give additional space when conditions require it.
Can I Cross a Solid Line to Pass?
There are circumstances where the law permits a driver to cross a line that would otherwise prohibit the movement in order to pass a vulnerable road user.
Section 157.1 of the Motor Vehicle Act provides an exception to certain otherwise prohibited movements when passing a vulnerable road user. The driver must first determine that the movement can be made safely and without affecting the travel of another vehicle.
In other words, a solid line does not automatically prevent you from moving across it to give a vulnerable road user the required passing space. Safety still comes first.
Passing Is Not a Licence to Take Risks
Meeting the minimum distance requirement does not, by itself, make a pass safe or legal.
You still need adequate visibility, sufficient room and enough time to complete the manoeuvre without affecting other road users.
On a narrow two-lane highway, for example, the safest choice may be to slow down and follow the vulnerable road user until you have a clear opportunity to pass completely into the opposing lane while maintaining the required distance.
Following and Passing Are Different
It is easy to focus on the 1-metre and 1.5-metre passing rules and overlook the need to maintain a reasonable and prudent following distance.
Think of it this way:
- Following: Maintain a reasonable and prudent distance appropriate for the traffic and highway conditions.
- Passing where the posted speed limit is 50 km/h or less: Leave at least 1 metre.
- Passing where the posted speed limit is more than 50 km/h: Leave at least 1.5 metres.
- Passing on a sidewalk or in a protected cycle lane: Leave at least 0.5 metre.
The passing distances are minimum legal distances. Good driving may require more.
The Bottom Line
When you encounter a vulnerable road user, slow down, give them space and be patient.
If you cannot pass safely while maintaining the required distance, wait.
A few seconds of patience is a small price to pay for giving someone outside a motor vehicle the room they need to travel safely.
Learn More
- Log in to post comments
Comments
While they present challenges for the motorist, I think the newly implemented passing distances are a good idea and should increase safety for those with whom we share the road.
However, there needs to be accompanying legislation governing the use of alternative modes of transport on our roadways.
I frequently see cyclists traveling the wrong way in bike lanes (a very dangerous situation for all road users).
Further, the increased mis-use of electric bikes, one wheels, scooters and often the worst offenders mobility scooters increasing crates hazardous situations on our highways.
There is little to no enforcement nor education for those who use the roads. I would not have known about the new passing rules of I were not a member of this group.
How do people learn this? Who instructs cyclists or users of other unregulated vehicles for their safe and legal use on the highway?
Until these questions are met with strong answers in the shape of mandatory continuing education for all road users, we are going to see a continued rise in highway accidents.
Road users simply cannot follow rules that they do not know.
- Log in to post comments
Not sure why they included motorcycles given the rest of the vehicles listed are typically slower than cars.
Of course, given the number of idiots who try to share lanes with motorcycles, maybe it will have an effect.
- Log in to post comments
this law is very naive plus has a great flaw, if a cyclist falls for whatever reason a vehicle will kill the person right away. I have seen pedestrians rolled over by cars because the pedestrian has turned around. When a person turns around occupies a space of about 70 cms.
how does a the law enforce this distance of 1 m when the bike lane has about 1 m wide? the car should move 1 m to the left and then it will crash with the oncoming traffic, forcing the car to slow down and drive at 18 km/h (no regular person bikes at speed higher than 18 to 20 km per hour.
anyways we need people with experience writing laws. we need studies
- Log in to post comments
Here is the first one that I found:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1369847819304930
I'll keep looking as time permits....
- Log in to post comments
On sideroads without a shoulder there will be some problems.
Most pedestrians walk about 2 free off the pavement but some do not and that makes space problematic. The only way to pass legally then would be to cross into the oncoming lane, if there is no traffic.
Bicycles are a slightly different issue. They usually ride about 2 feet in from the edge of the pavement which does not allow enough legal space at all to pass without crossing into the oncoming lane.
If the lanes were all 12 feet all should be fine but some are not.
Can you visualize the shmoz on a reasonably busy road with moderate bicycle traffic? Your average driving speed would work out to 10 km/h if you were lucky.
- Log in to post comments
Well now, that's kinda confusing.
I thought road line markings were made on the determination of whether or not there was a safe visual distance to be able to make a pass safely.
If the line is solid there is not enough physical or viewing distance to determine whether a pass can be performed safely. If it is dotted, then there is. This change of rules seems kinda dangerous to me. Not to mention so far out of sync with the rest of the continent as to cause big problems for visiting drivers.
- Log in to post comments
Despite the law requiring people driving vehicles to maintain a minimum passing distance of 1 meter in urban areas and 1.5 meters on highways, as per the news story, the Vancouver Police Department (VPD) determined that the person cycling was partially at fault for the crash, suggesting they should have moved into gaps between parked cars to allow the vehicle to pass. Weaving around parked vehicles is not safe; people cycling are taught to maintain a straight line. This interpretation contradicts the intent of the law, which is designed to prioritize the safety of those using non-motorized forms of transportation.
Additionally, legal professionals incorrectly claimed that people cycling cannot fully occupy a lane, further fueling misconceptions that endanger vulnerable road users. B.C. laws explicitly allow cyclists to use the full width of a lane when necessary for safety, ensuring adequate space between vehicles and preventing dangerous overtaking maneuvers.
This incident highlights an urgent need for:
- Clearer enforcement and accountability from law enforcement to uphold safe passing laws.
- Public education initiatives to ensure drivers understand the rights of people biking and other vulnerable road users.
- Stronger policy protections that prevent legal misinterpretations from undermining safety measures.
People walking, cycling, rolling using wheelchairs, and mobility device users deserve roads designed for safety, not uncertainty. Advocacy groups and concerned citizens call on the Province of British Columbia and ICBC to take immediate action in reinforcing safe passing laws and ensuring proper support for vulnerable road users affected by negligence. ..."
HUB Cycling Calls for More Driver and Police Education to Protect Vulnerable Road Users
- Log in to post comments

Shoulders, Bike Lanes and Sidewalks