CASE LAW - R v Rahmani
- Read more about CASE LAW - R v Rahmani
- Log in to post comments
This is an appeal to the Supreme Court over the dismissal of a number of violation tickets by Judicial Justice Adair. In each case the justice decided to dismiss these traffic tickets because they took too long to proceed to trial. Neither the Crown nor the disputants involved had any input into these decisions.

Judging by the questions submitted to DriveSmartBC, one of the first responses people have after receiving a violation ticket is to find a defect, real or imagined, as a justification for not having to pay or to justify a dispute in traffic court.
I am representing my tenant in traffic court as his English fluency is somewhat weak. Two officers stopped him so I was wondering what would happen if only one of them showed up for the trial. I want to cross examine both officers and wonder if the Justice throw the case out since that would not be possible?