Would you believe me if I told you that the positioning of a stop sign at an intersection has nothing to do with where you must stop? Yes, the sign tells you that you must stop, but the markings on the roadway, or lack of them, tell you where the stop has to take place. There are four possibilities for a driver to consider.
Marked Stop Line
The first possibility is where there is a marked stop line. You must stop at the marked stop line according to the Motor Vehicle Act and just before the line according to Learn to Drive Smart, our provincial driving manual. Either case requires the stop to be made reasonably close to the line, but not on or after it.
Marked Crosswalk
The next possibility is when a crosswalk is painted on the roadway without a stop line. Both rule books describe this situation identically requiring that you stop just before entering the crosswalk. Pedestrians must not have to detour around the front of your vehicle when they are walking within the boundaries of the crosswalk.
Unmarked Crosswalk
The third possibility requires a bit more observation and thought on the part of the driver who must identify and deal with the unmarked crosswalk. The courts have taken a very broad view in case law on the definition of a crosswalk. While a concrete or paved sidewalk is obvious by its presence any "improvement" of the shoulder used by pedestrians may not be. The sidelines of these improvements must be extended across the roadway and treated like the marked crosswalk.
No Markings, Just the Stop Sign
The final possibility considers the instance where there are no markings at all on the roadway. Drivers must stop at the point nearest the intersecting highway from which the driver has a view of approaching traffic on the intersecting highway. Since traffic includes cyclists and pedestrians in addition to motor vehicles, this sounds suspiciously close to the circumstances in the third situation.
Learn More
- Stopping at Intersections - Section 186 Motor Vehicle Act
- Rules of the Road - Chapter 4, Learn to Drive Smart
Share This Article
Stop ! I thought a Stop Sign meant slow down and stop if you see a vehicle or a pedestrian.
The whole intersection thing is completely misunderstood.
Example,,, I think the media does a great disservice to the public when they report things like : "A pedestrian was struck at an unmarked crosswalk....."
Giving the false impression that the pedestrian somehow had less of a right to cross at that location and the driver of the vehicle had less responsibility to yield.
- Log in to post comments
It seems most drivers aren't aware of this as they don't want to stop until they are in a position to see if any cross traffic is approaching. If they don't see anyone coming they continue on, effectively eliminating the stop from the stop. It's simple, stop where you are required to (you have now fulfilled your legal obligation to stop), then creep and peep, when you can see that no one is coming you can proceed, if there is cross traffic approaching you may have to stop again until it is safe to go.
- Log in to post comments
I walk to work and I think the biggest stop sign problem I see is people only looking left when they’re making a right turn.
Very few people even bother to check to their right side, let alone the important shoulder check for cyclists sharing the road with them, until they turn right.
The worst intersection on my walk is 103A Ave and 154 St in Surrey. 103A has the stop sign and there is often a lot of traffic going east trying to turn left up to 104 Ave. 14 crashes there from 2009-2013 according to ICBC crash maps.
The left turners get backed up and many people pass on the right to make their right turn. I’ve had to stop in front of the left turning vehicle several times because the person making the right turn is pulling out to see past the left turner and usually sees me last minute.
The sad reality is that it’s almost safer to jaywalk…. At least then there are no cars nearby.
- Log in to post comments
I actually watched a right turning driver bump two pedestrians while looking left for a gap in traffic and not looking in front of his car before he moved. The male pedestrian walked around to the drivers window to give him an earful and the driver never took his phone away from his ear the whole time, apparently his phone conversation was that important. Remember folks, when your vision is taken away from in front of you when you are stopped, look out the front windshield BEFORE your car moves the first inch, it's amazing what, or who you will find there.
- Log in to post comments
The suggestion here (Victoria) has been that cyclists should be allowed to do the 'Idaho stop', i.e., slow down and yield but not come to a complete stop. Complaints by motorists that cyclists need to follow the law and come to a complete stop. Meanwhile in the real world, motorists, motorcyclists, and cyclists all do the 'Idaho stop', i.e., role through a stop sign or on doing a right turn on red, looking only to the left and pedestrians be damned (or hit). Meanwhile, a driving 'expert' in our local newspaper (the Times Colonist) proclaims that pedestrians should walk against traffic so that they can see what is coming. Anyone who actually walks on roads knows that walking against traffic is less safe than walking with traffic.
The greatest danger for pedestrians are not vehicles coming from behind, it is left turning vehicles (as it is for cyclist and drivers). If you are walking on the right side of the road (with traffic), left turning traffic is less of a hazard.
- Log in to post comments
There are SO many fines issued by police where a car stops before the lines indicated , then the car proceeds to inch forward in order to be able to have a good view about the oncoming traffic.
If there is traffic the vehicle stops on top of the crosswalk and that is a fine.
Justice and law on this case should not be subject to police men interpretation. They should be more loyal to the spirit of the law. These cases have been also interpreted as rolling Stop by police men.
There are cases where the police demands the stop before the stop sign and not before the line.
Are those police men punished with fines when they lose the case? They should be subject to disciplinary actions but they are not.
Thanks for allowing me to vent my frustrations with the law.
- Log in to post comments
If I could weigh in on the subject today, I would like to request you consider expanding on the crosswalk issue to include the rules regarding what a driver must do upon a pedestrian entering a crosswalk or initiating crossing at an uncontrolled intersection. IE; how drivers fail to wait till pedestrians have cleared the crosswalk.
Furthermore there is the little known or acknowledged subject of when a vehicle claims the crosswalk and what pedestrians must do and not of course.
This article mentions not blocking pedestrians, but pedestrians seldom wait for the crosswalk to be clear of vehicles that have lawfully claimed the crosswalk.
This is an issue where pedestrians get enraged at drivers, and where drivers see conflict when attempting to complete a maneuver while the pedestrian actively impedes the flow of traffic.
- Log in to post comments
- Log in to post comments
I had to say this.....