Gordon Mace, a 40 year old driver who held a class 7 driver's licence and was part of the Graduated Licencing Program (GLP) appeals a driving prohibition imposed by RoadSafetyBC after he received two traffic tickets.
The first was a speeding violation from February 21, 2015; and the second a violation for failing to obey a traffic control device (turning left where prohibited) from May 6, 2016.
Driving Prohibition Imposed
Subsequent to that, the Superintendent sent Mr. Mace a notice of intention to prohibit him from driving for 4 months because of the two violations. On review of that decision, the Superintendent reduced the length of the prohibition to 3 months and applied the prohibition.
Appeal of Prohibition
Mr. Mace applied to the Supreme Court to have the prohibition set aside on the grounds that he was not a danger to the public when the offences occurred and that because he had 4 years of driving experience he should not be considered a new driver.
Decision
Madam Justice DeWitt-Van Oosten did not agree and confirmed the prohibition.
[45] I am satisfied that there was evidence before the Adjudicator from which she could reasonably make the findings that she did. I am also satisfied that her analytic path was transparent and intelligible. Finally, with reference to the Guidelines as they apply to Class 7 licence holders, it is apparent that the Adjudicator's decision falls within a range of possible, acceptable outcomes on the facts; see Dunsmuir at para. 47. She was responsive to the appellant's submissions, as put before her, and in light of them, she reduced the four-month prohibition to three.
[46] For these reasons, the appeal under s. 94(1) of the MVA is dismissed.
Reasons for Judgment
Share This Article
What ever happened to taking responsibility for your actions?
The restricted lenency of a Class 7 license is not rocket science. Regardless of 4 years or 40 years of previous driving experience, a Class 7 limits consideration when assessing violations.
A 4 month prohibition is not the end of the world and chopping a month off is more than he deserved. Suck it up, eh?
- Log in to post comments
After all, if Mr Mace had elected to take his Class 5 Road Test (he was eligible to do so from May 2014, but either didn't bother, or was unable to qualify) he wouldn't be faced with this problem.
Class 7 Restrictions are strict, and that's the way it's meant to be; this is why ICBC (along with other leading jurisdictions around the world) introduced Graduated Licensing.
- Log in to post comments
- Log in to post comments
Mace v Superintendent of Motor Vehicles