Case Law: Borgford v. Ball — The Misunderstood Stop Sign Rule

If you stop at a stop sign, does the cross-traffic always have the right-of-way? Most drivers in British Columbia assume the answer is yes, but the legal reality under the B.C. Motor Vehicle Act (MVA) might surprise you.

The B.C. Supreme Court case of Borgford v. Ball (2022 BCSC 2026) highlights how extreme speeding and a misunderstood right-of-way rule can quickly turn an intersection into a legal and physical disaster area.

The Crash: Double the Speed Limit

The collision occurred at the intersection of 190 Street and 34A Avenue in Surrey.

• The Drivers: Ms. Borgford was driving a Dodge Avenger westbound on 34A Avenue, facing a stop sign. Ms. Ball was driving a Dodge Ram 2500 northbound on 190 Street, which was a through highway.
• The Speed: The posted speed limit for both roads was 50 km/h. However, electronic data and crash reconstruction showed that both drivers were traveling at approximately 90 km/h right before the crash.
• The Impact: Ms. Borgford failed to stop completely at her stop sign, pulling out into the intersection. Ms. Ball's heavy truck slammed into her passenger side.

The Legal Pivot: Section 175 of the MVA

The core of this case centers on Section 175 of the Motor Vehicle Act, which regulates drivers entering a through highway. The law actually splits right-of-way responsibilities into a shifting two-step process:

1. Yielding to Immediate Hazards: When you approach a through highway with a stop sign, you must stop and yield the right-of-way to any vehicle that has entered the intersection or is approaching so closely that it constitutes an "immediate hazard."
2. The Right-of-Way Shift: Once you have stopped and yielded to immediate hazards, you may proceed. At that exact moment, the onus shifts to the drivers on the through highway, who must yield the right-of-way to you.

Why Both Drivers Were at Fault

Justice Fleming determined that because both drivers departed significantly from standard safe driving practices, liability had to be shared. Both breached Section 144 of the MVA (the prohibition against careless driving).

• Ms. Borgford (65% Liable): She failed to stop at the stop sign and did not adequately look for approaching traffic before entering the intersection.
• Ms. Ball (35% Liable): Even though she was on the through highway, her extreme speed (90 km/h in a 50 km/h zone) stripped away her status as an "immediate hazard." Had she been driving the speed limit, Ms. Borgford could have completed the crossing safely, or Ms. Ball would have had time to brake and avoid the crash.

Key Takeaways for BC Drivers

• Stop signs do not mean permanent yielding: If you stop and wait for a safe gap, cross-traffic must legally yield to let you through.
• Speeding forfeits your right-of-way: If you are speeding excessively on a main road, a court may rule that you were not an "immediate hazard" when a driver looked, making you partly liable for a collision.
• Shared blame is common: B.C. courts heavily penalize drivers who fail to maintain visual alertness, even if they technically have the "right-of-way".

Found this article useful? Help keep BC roads safer by sharing it with your network using the buttons below!